REQUEST FOR REVIEW PANEL NOMINATION

REQUEST FOR REVIEW PANEL NOMINATION

ONE FORM PER NOMINEE – ALL FIELDS TO BE COMPLETED

 

NOMINATION GUIDANCE – NUMBERS TO BE NOMINATED

 

All reviews require

1 person from Industry and

1 person from Academia to be nominated

 

A short resume or CV is required with each nomination

 

$UserDefinedForm

 

Team Composition Education Accords:

 

In the case of the Accords, the review team normally comprises two academic persons and one industry person each from different jurisdictions.

The review team leader, who is selected by the committee, should desirably have been a member of a previous international review or evaluation team.

The team should desirably cover a range of disciplines

 

Team Member Characteristics:

 

Essential Criteria

 

•    Experienced in the relevant national accreditation or competence assessment in their own jurisdiction

•    Possesses good communication skills including being able to communicate in English.

•    Understands protocols for working in different cultures

•    Able to work collaboratively in a self-managed international peer group, noting that the team produces its report without secretarial assistance.

•    Has time available (including 7 -14 days for a review visit or a number of shorter reviews over a 3 year period) without remuneration

•    Familiar with the IEA review requirements and exemplars

•    Prepared to contribute feedback to improve the review process

 

Desirable Criteria

 

•    Been a Visit Chair of accreditations and/or served on the Accreditation Board or equivalent decision making body in their own jurisdiction.

•    Has previous experience as a review team member of the relevant IEA Accord

•    Able to communicate in the language of the jurisdiction being reviewed

•    Available to act as a team member for at least three years.

 

 

 

Team Composition Competency Agreements:

 

In the case of Competence Agreements the review team normally comprises two industry persons and one academic person each from different jurisdictions.

The review team leader, who is selected by the committee, should desirably have been a member of a previous international review or evaluation team.

The panel should desirably cover a range of disciplines. Reviewer Characteristics:

Essential Criteria

 

•    Experienced in the relevant national accreditation or competence assessment in their own jurisdiction

•    Possesses good communication skills including being able to communicate in English.

•    Understands protocols for working in different cultures

•    Able to work collaboratively in a self-managed international peer group, noting that the team produces its report without secretarial assistance.

•    Has time available without remuneration

•    Familiar with the IEA review requirements and exemplars

•    Prepared to contribute feedback to improve the review process

 

Desirable Criteria

 

•    Had a leadership role in operation of registration, licensure or competence assessment systems in their own jurisdiction.

•    Has previous experience as a review team member of the relevant IEA Agreement

•    Able to communicate in the language of the jurisdiction being reviewed

•          Available to act as a team member for at least three y

 

Team CompositionEducationAccords:

 

InthecaseoftheAccords,thereviewteamnormallycomprisestwoacademicpersonsandone industrypersoneachfromdifferentjurisdictions.

Thereviewteamleader,whoisselectedbythecommittee,shoulddesirablyhavebeenamember ofapreviousinternationalreview orevaluationteam.

Theteam shoulddesirablycoverarangeofdisciplines

 

Team MemberCharacteristics:

 

EssentialCriteria

 

•    Experiencedintherelevantnationalaccreditationorcompetenceassessment intheir ownjurisdiction

•    Possessesgoodcommunication skillsincludingbeingableto communicateinEnglish.

•    Understandsprotocolsforworking indifferentcultures

•    Abletowork collaborativelyinaself-managedinternational peergroup, noting thatthe team producesitsreportwithoutsecretarialassistance.

•    Hastimeavailable (including 7-14daysforareviewvisitoranumberofshorter reviews overa3yearperiod)withoutremuneration

•    Familiarwith theIEA review requirementsandexemplars

•    Prepared tocontributefeedbacktoimprovethereview process

 

DesirableCriteria

 

•    BeenaVisitChairofaccreditationsand/orservedontheAccreditationBoardor equivalentdecisionmaking bodyintheirownjurisdiction.

•    Haspreviousexperienceasareview team memberoftherelevantIEAAccord

•    Ableto communicateinthelanguageof thejurisdictionbeingreviewed

•    Available toactasateam memberforatleastthreeyears.


 

 

Team CompositionCompetencyAgreements:

 

InthecaseofCompetenceAgreementsthereviewteamnormallycomprisestwoindustry persons andone academic personeachfrom differentjurisdictions.

Thereviewteamleader,whoisselectedbythecommittee,shoulddesirablyhavebeenamember ofapreviousinternationalreview orevaluationteam.

Thepanelshoulddesirablycoverarangeofdisciplines. ReviewerCharacteristics:

EssentialCriteria

 

•    Experiencedintherelevantnationalaccreditationorcompetenceassessment intheir ownjurisdiction

•    Possessesgoodcommunication skillsincludingbeingableto communicateinEnglish.

•    Understandsprotocolsforworking indifferentcultures

•    Abletowork collaborativelyinaself-managedinternational peergroup, noting thatthe team producesitsreportwithoutsecretarialassistance.

•    Hastimeavailablewithoutremuneration

•    Familiarwith theIEA review requirementsandexemplars

•    Prepared tocontributefeedbacktoimprovethereview process

 

DesirableCriteria

 

•    Hadaleadership roleinoperationof registration, licensureorcompetenceassessment systemsintheirownjurisdiction.

•    Haspreviousexperienceasareview team memberoftherelevantIEAAgreement

•    Ableto communicateinthelanguageof thejurisdictionbeingreviewed

•          Available toactasateam memberforatleastthreey